Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40834028›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

An examination of the Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scale (SSIS-RS) teacher and parent forms factor structure in a sample of Mexican American preschool-aged children.

Hanjoe Kim, Jacqueline R Anderson, Jorge E Gonzalez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanjoe KimDepartment of Psychology, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Jacqueline R AndersonCollege of Education and Behavioral Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greely, Colorado, United States of America.
Jorge E GonzalezDepartment of Education, Trinity University, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4783-4742

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social skills assessment has become integral to childhood mental health evaluation and a target for interventions, especially among school psychologists. One popular multi-rater social skill instrument is the Social Skills Improvement System Rating Scales (SSIS-RS), which is designed to evaluate social skills, problem behaviors, and academic competence in children. While previous versions of the SSIS have been widely used in research and practice, including use with translations across multiple languages, few studies have examined the psychometric properties of the most recent iteration of the SSIS-RS with diverse populations. The current study used the Spanish Parent and English Teacher versions to assess its construct validity with a Mexican American population. Confirmatory factor analysis conducted with data from 624 parents and 135 teachers rating 761 Mexican American children's social skills and problem behaviors revealed adequate psychometric properties but varied somewhat from the proposed scale models of the SSIS-RS. The differences may be due to the cultural uniqueness of Mexican origin compared to the norming sample. Further, similarities and discrepancies were found when comparing the factor structures between parent and teacher ratings. These results suggest that while parents and teachers shared views on the children, environmental factors and the language of the SSIS-RS might have influenced their responses.

Indexed as

Mexican AmericansParentsSchool TeachersSocial SkillsChildChild, PreschoolFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMalePsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID40834028
PMCPMC12367192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.