ArticlePloS one2025
On nonparametric estimating ROC curve based on non-uniform rational B-spline.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CLDN8 and ABCA12 define a shared molecular signature in ulcerative colitis-psoriasis comorbidity.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is a commonly used statistical method to assess the efficacy of a diagnostic test or biomarker measured on a continuous scale. This work presents a versatile approach using a non-uniform rational B-spline (NURBS) for estimating the ROC curve. This approach uses control points, weights, and the knot sequence to more accurately estimate the true ROC curve. The new method applies linear constraints to the NURBS basis function coefficients to smooth the empirical ROC curve and guarantee a non-decreasing function. Moreover, as a specific case, a NURBS curve devoid of interior knots simplifies to the Bernstein polynomial when all weight values are equal. We conduct Monte Carlo simulation studies to evaluate how well the NURBS-based estimator works in different scenarios. We compare our estimator to the empirical ROC, the kernel-based ROC, and Bernstein polynomial estimators in terms of the averaged squared errors. We also apply our method to two real medical datasets, such as metastatic kidney cancer and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma datasets. According to the findings from both the real and simulated data, the NURBS method is a powerful alternative for estimating the ROC curve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.