ArticleOptometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry2025
Accommodative responses in children with high and low levels of astigmatism.
Article in Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
significanceChildren with uncorrected astigmatism are often assumed to accommodate to the circle of least confusion. However, empirical evidence in children without a history of refractive correction is lacking. This study found that most children accommodate toward the anterior focal plane, with both focal planes exhibiting a lag of accommodation. PURPOSE: To examine accommodative responses by measuring refractive states of the eye during near viewing in children with uncorrected astigmatism without a history of refractive correction.
methodsParticipants aged 3 to <10 years with no history of refractive correction monocularly viewed a 20/250 letter at a 3-D demand (33 cm) while accommodative responses were measured using open-field autorefraction. Responses were classified based on the focal plane closest to the stimulus: anterior or posterior focal plane, or circle of least confusion. Cycloplegic autorefraction was used to classify participants as having low astigmatism (≤1.50 D) or high astigmatism (>1.50 D). Participants were further subdivided as having hyperopia (≥2.00 D), myopia (≥0.75 D), or emmetropia (less than 0.75 D myopia and 2.00 D hyperopia) based on their spherical cycloplegic refractive error. Chi-square analyses and Fisher exact tests were used to assess the association between accommodative response and cycloplegic refractive error classification.
resultsOf the 352 participants, 316 (89.8%) had low astigmatism and 36 (10.2%) had high astigmatism. In both groups, significantly more participants were classified as being focused at the anterior focal plane (low: 98.7%; high: 83.3%) than the posterior focal plane (low: 0.6%; high: 0.0%) or circle of least confusion (low: 0.6%; high: 16.7%; p<0.001). Almost all nonhyperopic participants in the low astigmatism group (99.2%) and hyperopic participants irrespective of astigmatism magnitude (low: 100%; high: 95.2%) accommodated closer to the anterior focal plane with accommodative lags in both meridians. Most nonhyperopic participants with high astigmatism also accommodated to the anterior focal plane (66.7%) and a third to the circle of least confusion (33.3%).
conclusionsIn contrast to the assumption that children with astigmatism accommodate to the circle of least confusion, our findings show that most children accommodated to the anterior focal plane during near-viewing tasks, with accommodative lags in both meridians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.