Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40833950›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Environmental DNA from peck marks shows potential for non‑invasive monitoring of woodpeckers.

Muhammad Bilal Sharif, Björn Ferry, Jérôme Fuchs, Bodil Cronholm, Peter D Heintzman, Love Dalén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad Bilal SharifCentre for Palaeogenetics, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0581-0542
Björn FerryIndependent Researcher, Storuman, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6372-4298
Jérôme FuchsInstitut de Systématique Evolution Biodiversité, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle CNRS SU EPHE UA, Paris, France.
Bodil CronholmDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden.
Peter D HeintzmanCentre for Palaeogenetics, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6449-0219
Love DalénCentre for Palaeogenetics, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring species' occurrences is essential for understanding ecosystem dynamics, tracking biodiversity changes, and guiding conservation efforts. Traditional monitoring methods, such as visual surveys, are challenging, particularly for elusive and endangered species. This proof-of-concept study explores the potential of environmental DNA (eDNA) collected from peck marks as a non-invasive tool for detecting and identifying woodpecker species. We collected nine samples from fresh peck marks on birch and spruce trees in the forests of Swedish Lapland. In two samples, we successfully amplified an 81 base-pair fragment of the woodpecker mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene. Taxonomic assignment identified the Eurasian three-toed woodpecker (Picoides tridactylus), a species classified as "Near Threatened" in Sweden. We collected an additional 15 samples from 4-19 years old peck marks preserved inside the trunks of birch and pine trees in the same area. No woodpecker DNA was detected in these samples, likely due to DNA degradation. Our findings demonstrate the potential of using eDNA from peck marks as a non-invasive approach for monitoring elusive woodpecker species.

Indexed as

BirdsDNA, EnvironmentalEnvironmental MonitoringAnimalsBetulaBiodiversityEcosystemForestsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwedenDNA, EnvironmentalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID40833950
PMCPMC12367160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.