Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40833949›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Nutrient profiling and degree of food processing of child-targeted packaged foods in Türkiye: An urgent call for policy action.

Lütfiye Parlak-Yetişen, Derya Dikmen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lütfiye Parlak-YetişenDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6990-795X
Derya DikmenDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2099-2863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the nutritional quality and degree of processing of packaged foods and beverages marketed to children in Türkiye using nutrient profiling models and the NOVA classification. A cross-sectional study was conducted by collecting packaging and label data from child-targeted food and beverage products available in grocery stores.The study was carried out in 23 grocery stores in Ankara, Türkiye. A total of 775 packaged food and beverage products marketed to children aged ≥3 years were analyzed. The products were assessed for compliance with four different nutrient profile models (NPMs) and classified according to the NOVA food processing system. Findings indicate that 93.2% of products did not comply with the WHO NPM-2023 criteria and should not be marketed to children. Additionally, the majority of these products were classified as Nutri-Score groups D and E (70%) and ultra-processed (92.7%). Ultra-processed foods had a significantly lower nutritional quality (p < 0.001) according to the Nutri-Score. A significant difference was observed between NOVA classification and product categorization under the NPMs (p < 0.001). Most packaged foods and beverages marketed to children in Türkiye are ultra-processed and nutritionally inadequate. According to WHO and other NPMs, these products should not be marketed to or consumed by children. There is an urgent need for policy interventions to restrict the marketing of unhealthy packaged foods targeted at children.

Indexed as

Food HandlingFood PackagingNutrition PolicyNutritive ValueBeveragesChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFast FoodsFood LabelingHumans

Identifiers

PMID40833949
PMCPMC12367171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.