Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40833922›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2025

"I know you didn't want to stay": emergency department conversations about disposition for people living with dementia.

Justine Seidenfeld, Matthew Tucker, Melissa Harris-Gersten, Gemmae M Fix, Nina R Sperber, Susan N Hastings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Justine SeidenfeldCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Matthew TuckerCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Melissa Harris-GerstenCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Gemmae M FixCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, Massachusetts, United States.
Nina R SperberCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Susan N HastingsCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, United States.

Funding

Geriatrics Emergency care Applied Research Network 2.1 - AdvanCing and Expanding Dementia care (GEAR 2.1 - ACED)R33AG069822 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Ula Y Hwang, MANISH N SHAH · 2023 to 2026
$5.3M
Geriatric Emergency care Applied Research network 2.0 - Advancing Dementia Care (GEAR 2.0 ADC)R61AG069822 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HWANG, ULA Y, SHAH, MANISH N · 2020 to 2021
$3.0M
Center of Innovation to Accelerate DiscoveryEmergency Medicine Foundation EMF22GEAR00006HSRD VA CIN 13-410National Institute on Aging Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network 2.0-Advancing Dementia Care program R33AG069822NIA NIH HHS R33 AG069822NIA NIH HHS R61 AG069822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesWhen people living with dementia present to the emergency department (ED), the disposition decision-to admit them to the hospital or discharge them home-can be difficult for providers. However, little is known about current real-world practices in disposition conversations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThis ethnographic study used direct observations of ED encounters with people living with dementia, their care partners, and ED providers at a Veteran Affairs facility in the Southeast United States. Follow-up interviews were conducted with patients and care partners. Interview guides and code book were informed by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method.

resultsData were collected over 45 days, with 20 ED encounters, 18 follow-up interviews, and baseline surveys obtained. For the 20 Veteran participants living with dementia, all were male, mean age was 79.4, and 50% were Black or African American. Major themes included: (1) Disposition conversations had significant variation in depth and content, (2) patient and care partner participation varied with disposition, and (3) satisfaction was driven by alignment of disposition preferences. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our study suggests that there are no consistent formats of disposition conversations for people living with dementia. Improving quality may be most needed when preferences are misaligned, and this should be identified early in the encounter.

Indexed as

CommunicationDementiaEmergency Service, HospitalPatient DischargeAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchUnited StatesVeteransCommunicationEmergency careEthnographyVeterans

Identifiers

PMID40833922
PMCPMC12370273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.