ArticleChemistryOpen2025
Comparison of Amorphous and Crystalline Ni-MOFs for Environmental Applications.
Article in ChemistryOpen, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Green synthesis of amorphous Ce-MOFs as efficient adsorbents towards Ofloxacin antibiotics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparison of Amorphous and Crystalline Ni-MOFs for Environmental Applications.ChemistryOpen · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Amorphous and crystalline nickel-based metal-organic frameworks (Ni-MOFs) were prepared via a one-pot synthesis at room temperature in methanol using 2-methylimidazole as a ligand. The crystallinity was adjusted by varying the solvent volume, yielding an amorphous phase with higher surface area (≈242 m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.