ArticleCarbon balance and management2025
Geochemical modeling of CO
Article in Carbon balance and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the global greenhouse effect intensifies, the emission and balance of greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide (CO2), have become crucial for achieving global carbon neutrality. Volcanic geothermal regions, as major natural sources of carbon emissions, release substantial volume of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere in various ways including volcanic eruptions, soil microseepages, vents, and hot springs. Among these, soil microseepages are particularly important due to their widespread and persistent nature. However, the geochemical dynamics of CO2 release from soil microseepage in volcanic regions remain poorly understood. In this study, we propose a novel CO2 release model employing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to model CO2 emissions from soil microseepage in volcanic regions. Our results provide important insights as follows: (1) Low porosity in subsurface strata inhibits CO2 penetration, while well-developed underground cracks and channels enhance release rates. (2) Favorable gas pathways enable CO2 to penetrate dense layers, and migrate upward, with migration patterns influenced by gas source pressure, temperature, and soil permeability. Slowing vertical migration increases horizontal diffusion and expands the effective surface release area. (3) Surface release is also influenced by external factors like wind speed, though these do not significantly affect underground seepage. (4) To improve the accuracy of CO2 flux measurements using the closed chamber method, it is recommended to reverse the initial slope of the CO2 concentration-time curve. This study provides critical data to enhance global carbon budget assessments and support efforts towards carbon neutrality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.