Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40833625›Full record

ArticleGenetica2025

Unveiling genetic variation among Bharal (Pseudois nayaur) in the Indian Himalayas using nuclear markers.

Deepesh Saini, Gaurav Sonker, Pooja Pant, Vishnupriya Kolipakam, Sambandam Sathyakumar, Salvador Lyngdoh, Sandeep Kumar Gupta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Deepesh SainiWildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Gaurav SonkerWildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Pooja PantWildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Vishnupriya KolipakamWildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Sambandam SathyakumarWildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Salvador LyngdohWildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Sandeep Kumar GuptaWildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. skg@wii.gov.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6295-0210

Funding

University Grants Commission 615/CSIR-UGC NET June 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the genetic structure of wild ungulate populations is essential for informed conservation planning, particularly in ecologically sensitive and topographically complex landscapes such as the Himalayas. We investigated the genetic variation in Bharal (Pseudois nayaur) populations from the western (WH) and eastern Himalayas (EH) using eight microsatellite loci. Our analysis revealed significant genetic divergence between WH and EH populations, with a Nei's genetic distance of 0.91 and a pairwise FST value of 0.14, indicating their delineation as distinct lineages. WH populations showed greater genetic affinity with the Himalayan Bharal (P. n. nayaur). In contrast, EH populations were closely related to the Chinese Bharal (P. n. szechuanensis) of the Tibetan Plateau. Hence, WH and EH Bharal represent distinct Evolutionarily Significant Units (ESUs) and should be managed as separate Management Units (MUs). It further highlighted the need for region-specific conservation strategies to safeguard the genetic integrity and ecological resilience of Bharal populations across the Indian Himalayan Region.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsGenetic MarkersGenetics, PopulationHimalayasIndiaMicrosatellite RepeatsPhylogenyGenetic MarkersConservation geneticsIndian himalayan region (IHR)Molecular taxonomyPhylogeneticsUngulates

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.