Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40833570›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Measuring Molecular Mass Densities at Subcellular Resolution Using Optical Diffraction Tomography.

Kyoohyun Kim, Abin Biswas, Jochen Guck, Simone Reber

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyoohyun KimMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany.
Abin BiswasMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany.
Jochen GuckMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany. jochen.guck@mpl.mpg.de.
Simone ReberMax Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany. reber@mpiib-berlin.mpg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological systems intricately regulate their density and volume throughout their life cycles and in response to physiological changes. Mass density, as a fundamental physical quantity, plays significant roles in biological processes such as differentiation, cell growth, protein synthesis, and condensate formation. Loss of density homeostasis on the other hand can have severe consequences including cellular senescence and disease states. Recent developments in biophotonics now enable high-resolution density quantification, providing new insights into the biophysical properties of cells and subcellular structures. One such technique is optical diffraction tomography (ODT), which offers label-free, high-resolution measurements of mass density distribution based on refractive index (RI) measurements. In this chapter, we present a comprehensive guide to implementing ODT for quantitative characterization of mass density distribution in biological systems, including in vivo (adherent cell culture) and in vitro (Xenopus egg extract) samples. We begin by detailing the optical setups, emphasizing key considerations for optimizing tomography acquisition. Subsequently, we introduce preparation protocols tailored to biological samples in various types of sample carriers and offer guidance on standard image acquisition and data analysis procedures. Finally, we address the challenges posed by the linear relationship between RI and mass density in complex substances, offering strategies for overcoming these limitations.

Indexed as

Tomography, OpticalAnimalsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMolecular WeightRefractometryCytoplasmLabel-free imagingMass densityNucleoplasmOptical diffraction tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.