ReviewDrug safety2026
Navigating Medical Device Safety: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Regulatory Directions.
Review in Drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of knowledge, attitude, and practice survey on materiovigilance among healthcare professionals.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Integrated Evidence from VigiBase and Clinical Trials: A Comprehensive Pharmacovigilance Analysis of Seven Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs).Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical devices are indispensable in modern healthcare. They enable the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases while enhancing patient outcomes. However, the increasing complexity of these devices, particularly those incorporating advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) introduces new challenges to their safe use. The vulnerabilities of medical devices can lead to adverse events ranging from minor complications to severe injuries or fatalities, and there is an increasing health risk to those devices that are interconnected to electronic health management systems and internet protocols. Despite efforts by regulatory authorities such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), and Health Canada, disparities in reporting systems and monitoring practices persist globally, hindering effective safety oversight. This paper explores the current landscape of medical device safety, focusing on regulatory frameworks, reporting systems, and the challenges posed by fragmented data collection and underreporting. It highlights the critical role of postmarket surveillance (PMS) in identifying risks and ensuring device performance in real-world settings. The integration of emerging technologies, such as AI for predictive safety and blockchain for traceability, offers promising solutions to enhance monitoring and mitigate risks early in the device lifecycle. In addition, the paper examines harmonization efforts led by organizations such as The International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF), the International Society of Pharmacovigilance (ISoP) and the World Health Organazition (WHO), which aim to standardize reporting practices and improve global collaboration. Key recommendations include leveraging real-world data, enhancing cybersecurity measures, and fostering international cooperation to streamline regulatory processes. By addressing these challenges and embracing innovation, stakeholders can ensure that medical devices continue to advance healthcare while maintaining the highest safety standards. Such collective efforts are essential for safeguarding patient trust and improving global health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40833550What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.