Trial reportJournal of robotic surgery2025
Enhanced cosmetic outcomes with central venous catheter drainage in transoral vestibular endoscopic thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized-controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of transoral vestibular endoscopic thyroidectomy versus open surgery in the treatment of unilateral thyroid malignancies.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Comment on "Enhanced cosmetic outcomes with central venous catheter drainage in transoral vestibular endoscopic thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized‑controlled trial".Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the rising incidence of thyroid cancer, there is an increasing focus on the cosmetic outcomes of thyroid surgery. This study introduces the use of a central venous catheter (CVC) tube as an innovative approach to enhance the aesthetic outcomes of drainage following transoral vestibular endoscopic thyroidectomy. A total of 104 patients were evenly assigned to either the conventional drainage tube group or the CVC tube group. All procedures were performed by the same experienced surgical team following identical operative protocols. The drainage devices were removed 48 h postoperatively, and all patients were discharged within this timeframe. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Scar formation and patient satisfaction were evaluated using the SCAR, VAS, and Patient Scar Satisfaction (PSS) scores. The clinical and surgical characteristics of the two groups did not exhibit significant differences. The average age was 33.56 years in the conventional group compared to 36.83 years in the CVC group. The cervical effusion volume recorded in the CVC group (3.69 mL at 24 h and 2.46 mL at 48 h postoperatively) was similar to that observed in the conventional group (3.63 mL at 24 h and 2.31 mL at 48 h postoperatively), with no statistically significant variance. Furthermore, the rates of complications were comparable between the groups. Notably, the SCAR and VAS scores, which evaluate postoperative scarring, were significantly reduced in the CVC group (p < 0.01), suggesting enhanced cosmetic results. Additionally, patient satisfaction was markedly higher in the CVC group. Our data objectively demonstrate superior postoperative cosmesis and satisfaction following in CVC tube comparison with regular tube.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40833517What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.