ArticleJournal of medical systems2025
Symptom Recognition in Medical Conversations Via multi- Instance Learning and Prompt.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robot-Assisted Oral Examination: Challenges and Innovations.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the widespread adoption of electronic health record (EHR) systems, there is a crucial need for automatic extraction of key symptom information from medical dialogue to support intelligent medical record generation. However, symptom recognition in such dialogues remains challenging because (a) symptom clues are scattered across multi-turn, unstructured conversations, (b) patient descriptions are often informal and deviate from standardized terminology, and (c) many symptom statements are ambiguous or negated, making them difficult for conventional models to interpret. To address these challenges, we propose a novel symptom identification approach that combines multi-instance learning (MIL) with prompt-guided attention for fine-grained symptom identification. In our framework, each conversation is treated as a bag of utterances. A MIL-based model aggregates information across utterances to improve recall and pinpoints which specific utterances mention each symptom, thus enabling sentence-level symptom recognition. Concurrently, a prompt-guided attention strategy leverages standardized symptom terminology as prior knowledge to guide the model in recognizing synonyms, implicit symptom mentions, and negations, thereby improving precision. We further employ R-Drop regularization to enhance robustness against noisy inputs. Experiments on public medical-dialogue datasets demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing techniques, achieving an 85.93% F1-score (with 85.09% precision and 86.83% recall) - about 8% points higher than a strong multi-label classification baseline. Notably, our model accurately identifies the specific utterances corresponding to each symptom mention (symptom-utterance pairs), highlighting its fine-grained extraction capability. Ablation studies confirm that the MIL component boosts recall, while the prompt-guided attention component reduces false positives. By precisely locating symptom information within conversations, our approach effectively tackles the issues of dispersed data and inconsistent expressions. This fine-grained symptom documentation capability represents a promising advancement for automated medical information extraction, more intelligent EHR systems, and diagnostic decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40833477What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.