Observational studyThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume2025
Of Mice and Men: Temporal Comparison of Femoral Shaft Fracture Healing After Intramedullary Nailing: Retrospective Observational Study of Modified Radiographic Union Scores for Tibia.
Observational study in The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResearchers employ murine fracture models to study bone healing, but the temporal relationship between mouse and human fracture healing is poorly understood. The hypothesis of this study was that it was possible to quantify specific post-fracture time frames corresponding to the stages of endochondral ossification in both mice and humans.
methodsRadiographs of mice and human femoral fractures treated with intramedullary stabilization were reviewed. The study included 330 human femoral fractures (OTA/AO 32A, B, or C injuries) that ultimately healed without complications in patients aged 18 to 55 years and 309 surgically created midshaft femoral fractures in 3-month-old C57BL6/J mice. Multiple orthopaedic surgeons assessed the radiographs using the Modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (mRUST). A 4-parameter log-logistic curve was fit to describe fracture healing over time, with 3 parameters allowed to vary: Y∞ (mRUST score at time = ∞), k (healing rate in [1/log(time)]), and X0.5 (time to half-healing).
resultsThe values (and 95% confidence interval) for the mice were Y∞ = 14.70 (14.54 to 14.87), k = 4.54/log(days) (4.30 to 4.77), and X0.5 = 11.77 days (11.56 to 11.98). For the humans, the values were Y∞ = 16.78 (16.21 to 17.36), k = 1.37/log(days) (1.28 to 1.45), and X0.5 = 91 days (83 to 99). All parameters differed significantly between the mice and humans (p < 0.05).
conclusionsUsing mRUST scoring and mathematical modeling, we were able to quantify and compare the temporal progression of fracture healing in mice and humans. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These data are relevant for designing and/or interpreting fracture healing studies of mice and humans to promote rational translation of fracture research between species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.