ArticleThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume2025
The Future Is Mobile: Pilot Validation Study of Apple Health Metrics in Orthopaedic Trauma.
Article in The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical utility and methodological implementation of smartphone-based mobility analysis: a scoping review.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Preinjury Smartphone-Derived Mobility Metrics Are Associated With Discharge Location After Lower Extremity Fracture.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurgeons often lack objective data on patient functional outcomes, particularly as compared with the patient's baseline. The present study aimed to determine whether gait parameters recorded on Apple iPhones provided longitudinal mobility data following lower-extremity fracture surgery that matched clinical expectations. We hypothesized that iPhones would detect the mobility changes of injury and early recovery, correlate with patient-reported outcome measures, and differentiate nonunion.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 107 adult patients with lower-extremity fractures who owned iPhones and had at least 6 months of follow-up. Participants shared Apple Health data and completed Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) surveys. The primary outcome was the daily step count. Four other gait-related parameters were analyzed: walking asymmetry, double support, walking speed, and step length. Mixed-effects models compared mobility parameters at pre-injury, immediate post-injury, and 6-months post-injury time points. Correlations between mobility parameters and PROMIS surveys were assessed. A mixed-effect model evaluated the relationship between step count recovery and surgery for nonunion.
resultsThere was a 93% reduction in daily step count from the pre-injury period to the immediate post-injury period (95% confidence interval [CI], -94% to -93%). Other gait parameters also showed increased impairment from pre-injury to post-injury. At 6 months, step count improved sixfold relative to the immediate post-injury period but remained 52% below baseline (95% CI, -55% to -49%). PROMIS Physical Function correlated moderately with step count (r = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.57) and weakly with other gait parameters. Patients with a known nonunion had a 55% slower recovery of step count than those without a nonunion (95% CI: 44% to 66%).
conclusionsApple Health mobility parameters captured changes in mobility following lower-extremity fracture and throughout the subsequent recovery period. These metrics distinguished between patients with and without nonunions, demonstrating their potential usefulness as objective, real-world functional outcome measures. These "digital biomarkers" may aid clinical decision-making and research and could be utilized for the early identification of patients at risk for poor outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.