ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Mathematical Models of Topically and Intravitreally Applied Ranibizumab.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) causes vision loss when vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) stimulates blood vessel growth into the light-sensitive retina. Anti-VEGF treatments such as ranibizumab are currently administered to treat wet AMD via intravitreal injections, which are unpleasant, expensive, and risk complications. We explored the efficacy of topically administered ranibizumab, with cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs). Methods: Ex vivo pig eyes were divided into three groups and treated with (1) topical or (2) intravitreal ranibizumab and CPP, or (3) intravitreal ranibizumab. ELISAs measured ranibizumab and VEGF concentrations in the aqueous and vitreous at 20 min, 40 min, 1 h, and 3.5 h (n = 3, per group). An ordinary differential equation model was formulated to describe the evolving concentrations of ranibizumab, VEGF, and their compounds in the tear, aqueous, and vitreal compartments. Results: Experimental-Topical: aqueous ranibizumab levels increased significantly, coincident with a significant drop in aqueous VEGF. Vitreal ranibizumab increased significantly, while vitreal VEGF remained constant. Intravitreal (with and without CPP): vitreal ranibizumab reached high concentrations, coincident with a significant drop in vitreal VEGF. Mathematical-topical treatment may provide sustained, moderate suppression of vitreal VEGF levels, while intravitreal treatment provides strong suppression, which lessens between treatments. Conclusions: CPP allows topical ranibizumab to penetrate the cornea. Combined intravitreal/topical treatment presents a promising approach; topical treatment suppresses vitreal VEGF levels between injections and thereby potentially reduces the frequency of injections. Treatment efficacy would be enhanced if ranibizumab's rate of binding to VEGF or tear residence time could be increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.