ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
HiCat: a semi-supervised approach for cell type annotation.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- RAG: a regularized adaptive graph-based method for rare-cell identification from single-cell expression data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- scUmaper: An automated framework for doublet removal and cell-type annotation in single-cell transcriptomics.iScience · 2026Article
- Network clustering algorithms and preprocessing pipelines for robust cell type identification in single-cell RNA sequencing data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- ArchetypeShift: An R Package Integrating KEGG-Informed Pathway Analysis and IPA-Derived Functional Predictions for Validation of Single-Cell Archetypes.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2026Article
- scANMF: Prior Knowledge and Graph-Regularized NMF for Accurate Cell Type Annotation in scRNA-seq.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Existing cell type annotation methods face significant hurdles: supervised approaches often fail to differentiate between novel cell types not present in reference data, while unsupervised techniques can suffer from cluster impurity and difficulties in robustly distinguishing multiple distinct unknown cell populations. This critical gap motivated the development of HiCat, a semi-supervised pipeline specifically designed to overcome these limitations. HiCat is a semi-supervised pipeline that integrates both approaches, leveraging reference (labeled) and query (unlabeled) genomic data to simultaneously enhance annotation accuracy for known cell types and improve the discovery and differentiation of novel ones. HiCat follows a structured pipeline: (1) removing batch effects and generate a low-dimensional embedding; (2) nonlinear dimensionality reduction for capturing key patterns; (3) unsupervised clustering for proposing novel cell type candidates; (4) merging multi-resolution features from previous steps into a condensed feature space; (5) training a classifier on reference data for supervised annotation; and (6) resolving inconsistencies between supervised predictions and unsupervised clusters to finalize annotations, particularly for unseen types. Performance was evaluated across 10 public genomic datasets and perform a case study on a molecular cell atlas of the human lung. HiCat demonstrated superior performance in both known cell type classification and novel cell type identification. In benchmark evaluations, HiCat consistently outperformed existing methods, critically excelling in identifying and distinguishing multiple novel cell types. HiCat presents a robust framework for scRNA-seq cell annotation, improving classification accuracy and novel type identification. In addition, it provides a scalable and transferable solution for biomedical research, directly addressing key challenges in automated cell annotation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.