ArticleJournal of rehabilitation medicine2025
Cross-sectional differences of physical and psychosocial measures in low back pain according to pain chronification risk groups.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Serum lipids and low back pain in male aircraft maintenance technicians: association after ergonomic exposure adjustment.Journal of occupational health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate whether low-back-pain patients classified based on the risk of pain chronification (low, medium, high) differ in psychosocial and physical function measures, and whether these subgroup differences are moderated by age, gender, and body mass index.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 595 Austrian patients with chronic low back pain (68% female; mean age: 53 ± 6.7 years) completed the STarT Back screening tool, visual analogue scale, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, Pain Disability Index, 5-level European Quality of Life Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Avoidance-Endurance fast screen. Physical function tests assessed maximum trunk strength, trunk range of motion, and hand grip strength, while multivariate analyses of variance evaluated differences among the risk groups.
resultsThe intensity of physical and psychosocial problems differed significantly among the pain chronification risk groups. Physical function also varied across subgroups, with the high-risk group exhibiting the weakest muscle strength and the greatest stiffness. Gender significantly moderated the association between pain risk group and trunk strength.
conclusionIn people of working age with chronic low back pain, the STarT risk of pain chronification was correlated with physical and psychosocial variables. Moreover, this screening tool can be used irrespective of personal factors such as age, gender, and BMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.