Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40833235›Full record

SynthesisHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

How Do Participatory Citizenship Models Inform Co-production in Health Research? A Systematic Review.

Catharine Rose, Lois Donnelly, Jess Howdle, Mark Lynes, Katharine Arnett, Mary Nettle, Eleanor Bradley

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Co-Producing Training Resources to Improve Healthcare Experiences for Young Women and Reduce Gendered Health Inequalities.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Embedding Multiperspective Reflections in Co-Producing a Training Intervention for Care Home Staff: Understanding Group Members' Journeys and Impacts.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Catharine RoseResearch Office, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9786-1389
Lois DonnellyResearch Office, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0025-9613
Jess HowdleResearch Office, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-9402-7803
Mark LynesResearch Office, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.
Katharine ArnettResearch Office, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.
Mary NettleResearch Office, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4153-061X
Eleanor BradleyResearch Office, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5877-2298

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCo-production within health research has increased rapidly over the past two decades, enabling citizens to shape health policy and practice. Yet, co-production can be shallow or undemocratic, providing little opportunity for meaningful citizen involvement. Participatory citizenship models are frameworks that outline the criteria by which citizens to belong and participate in a society. This review aimed to identify how participatory citizenship is enabled through co-production.

methodsA systematic review was conducted of studies in which a participatory citizenship model informed co-production strategies in health research.

findingsOf 215 unique articles, 13 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the synthesis. Four aspects characteristic of how participatory citizenship models inform co-production in health research were identified. These were, Aspect (1) Co-production enables diverse citizens to participate in health research; Aspect (2) Citizens' lived-experience contextualises and shapes all stages of the health research process; Aspect (3) Co-production shares power and ownership between citizens and research teams; and, Aspect (4) Co-production through health research enables citizens to actively participate in the development of their communities. The first three aspects enable the fourth aspect to be fully enacted within a research project.

conclusionCitizenship-informed co-production ensures research enables local citizens to apply their lived-experience and local knowledge to shape community health and is valuable to policymakers and practitioners working to reduce health inequalities. Researchers are encouraged to engage with these four aspects through authentic co-production. The authors present a set of recommendations for researchers based on the findings of the synthesis.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity ParticipationHealth Services ResearchHealth PolicyHumanscitizenshipco‐productionhealth inequalitiespatient and public participationpublic involvementsystematic reviewvalues

Identifiers

PMID40833235
PMCPMC12365993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.