ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025
Parental knowledge and attitudes toward genetic counseling and childhood genetic testing for congenital anomalies in Qatar.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Negotiating genetic risk in Indonesia: Development and psychometric evaluation of the knowledge and attitude toward consanguineous marriage instrument in a mixed-methods cross-sectional study.Journal of community genetics · 2026Article
- Pharmacogenomics of Antineoplastic Therapy in Children: Genetic Determinants of Toxicity and Efficacy.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Awareness, perceived barriers, and facilitators related to premarital screening and genetic counseling among Palestinian adults.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Parental knowledge and attitudes toward genetic counseling and childhood genetic testing for congenital anomalies in Qatar.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Qatar's genetic counseling landscape: Current insights and future prospects.Genetics in medicine open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate parental knowledge and attitudes toward genetic counseling and testing in the context of pediatric plastic surgery in Qatar. It assesses baseline knowledge to identify educational gaps and factors that may contribute to fear or reluctance in managing children with congenital anomalies. Parents of children with congenital anomalies visiting the pediatric plastic surgery clinic at Sidra Medicine participated in an online questionnaire from October 2022 to February 2023. The 37-question survey covered demographics, knowledge, and attitudes toward genetic counseling and testing, with knowledge scores ranging from 1 to 12 (scores above 9 indicating high knowledge). Responses were collected from 160 parents, representing various regions: Asia (26.6%), North Africa 25.3%, the Middle East 20.3%, America/Europe 5.7%, and Qatar 22.2%. Among them, 22.9% reported consanguinity, and 37% had children who underwent genetic testing. American/European parents (p = 0.016) and those with higher education (p = 0.006) showed greater genetic knowledge. Qatari parents had high knowledge 45.7% but lower perceived benefits and higher barriers. Consanguineous parents (p = 0.003) and those referred by medical providers (p < 0.001) had more positive attitudes toward genetic testing, while those with no prior testing experience or without another child with a genetic disorder displayed negative attitudes. This study highlights the need for culturally appropriate education on genetic counseling and testing for parents of children with congenital anomalies. Genetic counselors should consider education levels and consanguinity when discussing genetic testing to empower parents in making informed decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.