ArticleClinical nephrology2025
The effects of switching from etelcalcetide to upacicalcet in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism.
Article in Clinical nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsNo English-language research papers have reported on the clinical use of upacicalcet, a novel intravenous calcimimetic agent for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in hemodialysis patients. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the outcomes of switching from etelcalcetide to upacicalcet. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe subjects included 37 hemodialysis patients with SHPT treated with etelcalcetide before switching to upacicalcet. This study was a single-center retrospective study conducted in Japan. Serum levels of corrected calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), and the dose of maxacalcitol were assessed at 3 and 6 months after switching to upacicalcet.
resultsAs a result of the switch from etelcalcetide to upacicalcet, the serum corrected Ca level remained unchanged, from 8.9 ± 0.6 to 9.1 ± 0.7 mg/dL (p = 0.104) at 3 months and to 9.0 ± 0.6 mg/dL (p = 0.197) at 6 months. Meanwhile, the serum P level decreased from 6.3 ± 1.5 to 5.8 ± 1.5 mg/dL (p = 0.069) at 3 months and to 5.9 ± 1.9 mg/dL (p = 0.039) at 6 months. The iPTH level increased slightly, from 153.8 ± 100.3 pg/mL to 176.4 ± 124.6 pg/mL (p = 0.337) at 3 months and to 206.5 ± 168.7 pg/mL (p = 0.017) at 6 months. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the change in iPTH was related to the change in P levels.
conclusionThese findings suggested that upacicalcet may be a useful option for managing serum P levels in hemodialysis patients with SHPT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.