Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40832994›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of histochemistry : EJH2025

Forever particles: histochemistry in the plasticene age.

Beatrice Camia, Andrea Casasco, Manuela Monti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of histochemistry : EJH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beatrice CamiaSection of Histology and Embryology, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia.ORCID 0009-0004-1268-8911
Andrea CasascoSection of Histology and Embryology, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia; Italian Diagnostic Center (CDI), Milan.
Manuela MontiSection of Histology and Embryology, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia; Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia.ORCID 0000-0001-9651-7490

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The statement "Plastics define the way we live today" summarizes the findings of the Plastic Europe 2020 final document (https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-facts-2020/). Sadly, this also means that the plastic waste generated over the next decade is likely to become unmanageable. By 2050, plastic usage is expected to triple, resulting in a similar increase in plastic waste, with approximately half of it ending up in landfills. Emerging research indicates that micro and nanoplastics have been found in various human organs, including the gonads, placenta, blood, arteries, lungs, liver, kidney, and even the brain. This raises significant questions about their pervasive presence within our bodies and their potential threat to health. In addition to their harmful effects, these "forever particles" (micro/nanoplastics) can serve as Trojan horses, transporting additional pollutants such as bacteria and heavy metals into our bodies. In this review, we explore key aspects of the plastics crisis and urge the scientific community -especially those in the fields of cytochemistry and histochemistry, which adeptly connect morphology with function- to investigate the harmful effects of micro and nanoplastics that we encounter daily through ingestion or inhalation. This research should focus on various physiological levels, including DNA, cells, and tissues.

Indexed as

MicroplasticsPlasticsAnimalsHumansMicroplasticsPlastics

Identifiers

PMID40832994
PMCPMC12406116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.