Trial reportCancer research communications2025
Clinical Validity of FoundationOne Liquid CDx for Detection of BRAFV600E in Colorectal Cancer.
Trial report in Cancer research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolving roles of liquid biopsy in precision medicine for colorectal cancer: from single-gene analysis to broad genomic profiling.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Liquid Biopsy and Multi-Omic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: Innovations in Early Detection, Therapy Guidance, and Disease Monitoring.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe BRAF inhibitor encorafenib (Enco) plus the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab (Cetux) improved overall survival, objective response rate, and progression-free survival in previously treated BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer in BEACON, a phase III randomized trial, leading to regulatory approval for this indication. To support rapid, plasma-based testing for BRAFV600E identification, clinical validity of a ctDNA-based assay, FoundationOneLiquid CDx (F1LCDx), was assessed against the reference tumor-based clinical trial assay (CTA) in liquid biopsy-evaluable samples from BEACON and commercially obtained tissue-matched plasma samples. PATIENTS AND
methodsPretreatment tissue samples were collected in BEACON to confirm BRAF mutational status using the central single gene PCR assay. Concordance between the CTA and liquid biopsy tests was assessed, and clinical validity of liquid biopsy testing was examined using clinical outcomes from BEACON.
resultsOf the 523 evaluable patients, 433 with matched tissue and plasma samples had CTA and F1LCDx results available (BEACON, n = 328; commercial, n = 105). A strong concordance in detecting BRAFV600E was found between F1LCDx and CTA, with a positive percent agreement of 87.2% and negative percent agreement of 97.1%. Among 42 F1LCDx-/CTA+ samples, 41 (97.6%) had ctDNA tumor fraction <1%. Among samples with ctDNA tumor fraction >1%, the positive percent agreement was 99.4% and negative percent agreement was 86.7%. Clinical outcomes with Enco plus Cetux were similar between those identified as F1LCDx+/CTA+ and CTA+ overall.
conclusionsThis study supports using liquid biopsies as a clinically valid assay for identifying BRAFV600E alterations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, particularly when ctDNA tumor fraction was >1%. SIGNIFICANCE: In the phase III BEACON trial, which established Enco plus Cetux as a standard of care for previously treated BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer, mutational status was confirmed through testing of tumor tissue. To support rapid, less invasive testing for BRAFV600E in plasma, this retrospective study assessed a ctDNA-based assay and found strong concordance between the liquid biopsy test and the tumor-based assay in detecting BRAFV600E.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.