ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2025
Scale of Emotional Development-Questionnaire: A Systematic Approach to Improving Performance.
Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scale of Emotional Development-Questionnaire: A Systematic Approach to Improving Performance.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2025Article
- Psychometric Properties of the Questionnaire Epistemic Trust in People With Mild to Moderate Intellectual Disabilities or Borderline Intellectual Functioning.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn people with intellectual disabilities, emotional development progresses more slowly or stagnates, which can result in challenging behaviours. The Scale of Emotional Development-Questionnaire was designed to chart people's own emotional development, providing insight into basic emotional needs and resilience, while reducing prejudice, enhancing self-awareness and improving emotional expression.
methodsThe questionnaire was completed by 134 participants with moderate to borderline intellectual disabilities. Reliability, validity, internal structure and item performance were analysed to identify areas for improvement.
resultsPreliminary analyses indicated the questionnaire captures key aspects of emotional development, with most items showing strong factor loadings (51.79%). However, multiple items may require refinement due to moderate loadings (30.00%), low loadings (18.21%), limited variance (3.93%) and negative-low correlations.
conclusionThe Scale of Emotional Development-Questionnaire is a promising self-report interview of emotional development, complementing the proxy perspective of the Scale of Emotional Development-Short. The findings highlight areas for improvement and the need for further research post-revision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.