ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2025
Dementia in Intellectual Disability: An Exploratory Investigation of Comorbidity Patterns and Diagnostic Outcomes.
Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dementia in Intellectual Disability: An Exploratory Investigation of Comorbidity Patterns and Diagnostic Outcomes.Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDementia is more prevalent and tends to manifest earlier in individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) compared to the general population. Acquiring specific knowledge about comorbidities and diagnostic findings in individuals with ID who have dementia, as opposed to those with ID without dementia, is essential. Such insights are crucial for enhancing the quality of care.
methodsThe study was applied in a German outpatient clinic for people with ID and mental illnesses from February 2018 to September 2022. An exploratory comparison was conducted to identify differences in somatic and psychiatric comorbidities, laboratory results, cerebrospinal fluid results, neuroimaging, medication and challenging behaviour in people with ID with (n = 13, mean age: 54 years, 69% female) and without dementia (n = 73, mean age: 53 years, 48% female).
resultsIn this sample, persons with ID who have dementia are more likely to have Down syndrome and less likely to have affective disorders. They received antidementia drugs more often and atypical high-potency antipsychotics less often compared to persons with ID without dementia. All other clinical data showed no differences.
conclusionsInterestingly, no differences in somatic diseases (except Down syndrome) or laboratory and neuroimaging results could be found between people with ID with and without dementia. However, the diagnosis of dementia was associated with a reduced frequency of affective disorders and a reduced prescription of antipsychotics compared to the clinical sample without dementia. Due to the exploratory character of the study, replication in a much larger sample is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.