Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40832952›Full record

ArticleJournal of health psychology2025

Mothers discourses on baby monitors: A discursive analysis of Mumsnet posts on surveillance and risk management.

Chloé Michoud, Abigail Locke, María Del Río Carral

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chloé MichoudKeele University, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9149-666X
Abigail LockeKeele University, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2759-0579
María Del Río CarralUniversity of Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1676-3964

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recommendations against using commercial sleep monitoring devices to prevent sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), their use is increasing among parents. This study explores mothers' discursive constructions about the usage of baby monitors during their infants' sleep. By analysing 43 online posts from the website Mumsnet through Critical Discursive Psychology, two key discourses were identified: 'surveillance as a good mothering practice' and 'risk management via technology'. The first repertoire illustrated how mothers incorporate digital surveillance into their daily routines, using baby monitors as essential tools to enact 'good mothering'. The second repertoire shows how technology is portrayed as a beneficial tool for mothers and parents, helping in childcare and enhancing safety. In conclusion, baby monitors are seen as essential for managing mothering risks, but their pervasive use can create challenges, raising concerns about whether mothers should adapt to these tools or if the tools should better serve parents' needs.

Indexed as

MothersRisk ManagementSudden Infant DeathAdultFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornSleepbaby monitorcritical health psychologymothering practicesqualitative methodssleep monitoring device

Identifiers

PMID40832952
PMCPMC12678640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.