ArticlePerfusion2026
Calculation of blood loss in cardiac surgery: How should we monitor?
Article in Perfusion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Prospective Analysis of Viscoelastic Assays, Platelet Aggregometry, and Standard Laboratory Tests in Predicting Perioperative Blood Loss in Cardiac Surgery.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundThe bleeding in cardiac surgery remains a significant clinical problem. There is no "gold standard" method to quantify blood loss. Traditional measurement of drainage volume often underestimates or overestimates, as it does not consider the type of fluid. We hypothesized that blood loss could be more accurately calculated using the Hb/kg index in terms of haemoglobin (Hb) mass loss per kilogram of the patient's body mass. This study aimed to ObjectiveTo develop a novel approach for calculating actual blood loss using the Hb/kg index.MethodsThis single-center prospective study included 195 patients who underwent cardiac surgery between October 2023 and November 2024. The Hb/kg index was calculated based on intraoperative Hb loss, Hb loss via chest tubes, packed red blood cell transfusions and patient weight. Eighty-six additional clinical predictors were analyzed using conventional statistics and machine learning algorithms. Predictors with statistically significant Spearman correlations were included for further analysis.ResultsLasso regression achieved the best overall performance in predicting Hb/kg index. It yielded the lowest mean squared error (0.08 ± 0.04), mean absolute percentage error (0.18 ± 0.10), with the highest correlation (0.92 ± 0.06) and R² score (0.82 ± 0.13). BMI showed a significant negative relationship (-0.018,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.