Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40832774›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pulmonary medicine2025

An update on sleep disordered breathing in spinal cord injury.

David J Berlowitz, Marnie Graco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David J BerlowitzDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne.
Marnie GracoDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSleep disordered breathing (SDB) is a direct consequence of tetraplegic spinal cord injury (SCI), is highly prevalent in both tetraplegia and paraplegia, and is associated with worse daytime functioning and reduced quality of life. Despite this, most people with SCI are undiagnosed and untreated for the disorder. This narrative review summarises research from the last 5 years on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and consequences of SDB in SCI, as well as the current approaches to screening, diagnosis, and treatment of SDB in this population. RECENT

findingsPrevious research predominantly focussed on SDB in tetraplegia, however recent studies have established that people with paraplegia also experience substantially higher prevalence than the general population. SDB risk screening questionnaires are not helpful because SDB in SCI is so prevalent, and questionnaires alone cannot exclude true negative cases. Alternative treatments, such as mandibular advancement devices, are feasible and likely effective, and alternative care models may improve rates of diagnosis and access to treatments. SUMMARY: Recent research into SDB in SCI has identified novel, emergent themes, however researchers must collaborate more to achieve sample sizes that can deliver impact in this relatively rare population.

Indexed as

ParaplegiaQuadriplegiaSleep Apnea SyndromesSpinal Cord InjuriesHumansPrevalenceQuality of Lifeclinical careepidemiologypathophysiologysleep disordered breathingspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID40832774
PMCPMC12517716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.