ReviewCurrent opinion in pulmonary medicine2025
An update on sleep disordered breathing in spinal cord injury.
Review in Current opinion in pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pregnancy outcomes in people with spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study.Obstetric medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewSleep disordered breathing (SDB) is a direct consequence of tetraplegic spinal cord injury (SCI), is highly prevalent in both tetraplegia and paraplegia, and is associated with worse daytime functioning and reduced quality of life. Despite this, most people with SCI are undiagnosed and untreated for the disorder. This narrative review summarises research from the last 5 years on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and consequences of SDB in SCI, as well as the current approaches to screening, diagnosis, and treatment of SDB in this population. RECENT
findingsPrevious research predominantly focussed on SDB in tetraplegia, however recent studies have established that people with paraplegia also experience substantially higher prevalence than the general population. SDB risk screening questionnaires are not helpful because SDB in SCI is so prevalent, and questionnaires alone cannot exclude true negative cases. Alternative treatments, such as mandibular advancement devices, are feasible and likely effective, and alternative care models may improve rates of diagnosis and access to treatments. SUMMARY: Recent research into SDB in SCI has identified novel, emergent themes, however researchers must collaborate more to achieve sample sizes that can deliver impact in this relatively rare population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.