ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
SCORCH2: A Generalized Heterogeneous Consensus Model for High-Enrichment Interaction-Based Virtual Screening.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- TRPM8 virtual screening: the essential role of target-specific, inactive-enriched machine-learning scoring functions.Digital discovery · 2026Article
- Structure-aware artificial intelligence for next-generation drug discovery: from protein-ligand modeling to generative biomolecular design.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Integrative Computational Chemistry Approaches in Modern Drug Discovery: Advances in Docking, Pharmacophore Modeling, Molecular Dynamics, and Virtual Screening.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Article
- SCORCH2: A Generalized Heterogeneous Consensus Model for High-Enrichment Interaction-Based Virtual Screening.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The discovery of effective therapeutics remains a complex, costly, and time-consuming endeavor, characterized by high failure rates and significant resource investments. A central bottleneck in early-stage drug discovery is identifying suitable hit compounds with moderate affinity for known biological targets. Although advancements occur, current in silico virtual screening methods are subject to limitations, including model overfitting, data bias, and constrained interpretability in their predictive processes. In this study, we present SCORCH2, a machine learning-based framework designed to simultaneously enhance the performance and interpretability of virtual screening by leveraging interaction features. Comparing with its predecessor SCORCH, SCORCH2 exhibits superior predictive accuracy and generalizability across a wide range of biological targets. Importantly, SCORCH2 demonstrates robust hit identification capabilities on previously unseen targets, indicating strong transferability. Furthermore, SCORCH2 obviates the need for meticulous docking pose selection, streamlining the screening process. These advances highlight the potential of SCORCH2 as a valuable tool in accelerating drug discovery campaigns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.