Observational studyEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025
Impact of ventricular tachycardia ablation in the setting of electrical storm based on patient risk profile.
Observational study in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ablation timing in ECMO-supported electrical storm: one strategy does not fit all substrates.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- A practical 5-stage clinical scale for electrical storm: the STORM classification.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2026Article
- Ventricular arrhythmia ablation timing and outcomes in electrical STORM requiring V-A ECMO support: the STORM-ECMO study.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Electrical storm ablation: absolute benefit, risk-score discordance, and clinical equity.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsCatheter ablation (CA) plays a central role in the management of electrical storm (ES). PAINESD and iVT are two validated scores commonly used to assess periprocedural risk in patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. This study aimed to evaluate the association between CA and mortality in ES patients stratified by PAINESD and iVT risk scores. METHODS AND
resultsWe included 606 patients admitted for ES across four French centres. Risk was assessed using PAINESD and iVT scores. Mortality at 1 year was compared according to risk group and CA status. Baseline differences were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on predefined clinical variables. Forty-one per cent of patients were classified as high-risk using the PAINESD score, and 39.4% using the iVT score. Catheter ablation was performed in 42.4% of the cohort, including 39.4% of hi-PAINESD and 35.5% of hi-iVT patients. After adjustment, CA was associated with lower 1-year mortality in both high- and low-risk groups (adjusted HR: 0.42 [95% CI: 0.26-0.66], P = 0.0002 for hi-PAINESD; 0.31 [0.18-0.53], P < 0.0001 for hi-iVT). Inverse probability of treatment weighting-weighted models yielded consistent results. In exploratory interaction analyses, the iVT score-but not PAINESD-identified high-risk patients who may derive earlier survival benefit from VT ablation.
conclusionIn patients with electrical storm, VT ablation was associated with lower 1-year mortality across both low- and high-risk profiles. The iVT score may help identify high-risk patients who derive earlier benefit from ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.