ArticleJournal of the science of food and agriculture2025
Antagonistic activity of two yeasts against Penicillium expansum in stone fruits.
Article in Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preharvest application of antagonistic yeasts for the control of fungal pathogens in organic peach and plum orchards.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026Article
- Pulcherrimin and Beyond: The Multifaceted Role ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStone fruits are vulnerable to contamination by Penicillium expansum (PE), a patulin-producing mould. The use of yeasts as biocontrol agents could be an effective strategy to combat this pathogen. This study evaluated the ability of Metschnikowia pulcherrima L672 (L672) and Pichia kudriavzevii L40 (L40) as biocontrol strategies on peach (Romea), black plum (Black gold), nectarine (Nectavista), and flat peach (Flat Beauty), analysing their impact on incidence and severity of PE damage, patulin production and the expression of the idh gene, a key gene of the patulin biosynthetic pathway.
resultsThe results indicate that both yeasts reduced the incidence and severity of PE in the four stone fruit types studied, with a more pronounced effect observed for L672. This yeast reduced the presence of patulin in three of the stone fruits where patulin was produced by PE (nectarine, peach and black plum), while P. kudriavzevii L40 limited patulin production in peach by 90%. Regarding the study of the expression of the idh gene, L40 increased its expression compared to the control, although this effect varied among fruits. In contrast, L672 did not produce changes in gene expression in nectarines and black plums - fruits where patulin was not detected.
conclusionThe application of the yeasts L672 and L40 as biocontrol agents was shown to be an effective strategy to reduce the incidence and severity of PE and patulin production in stone fruits, with a greater effect of L672 in most cases. Furthermore, differences were observed in the regulation of the idh gene, suggesting that the efficacy of biocontrol in this aspect depends on both the yeast used and the type of fruit. © 2025 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.