ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025
Mapping Key Nodes and Global Trends in AI and Large Language Models for Medical Education: A Bibliometric Study.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry Training: Comparative Insights from Nine Large Language Models Across Cultural and Exam Contexts.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence driven transformation of pediatric eye health education based on bibliometric analysis and a cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The ethical challenges in the integration of artificial intelligence and large language models in medical education: A scoping review.PloS one · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Medical Education (2013-2024): A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Analysis.The East African health research journal · 2025Article
- Research hotspots and trends of artificial intelligence ethics in medicine: A bibliometric analysis from 1999 to 2025.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) are transforming medical education by enhancing teaching and assessment methods. Research output has surged, but key bibliometric trends remain underexplored. Methods: We retrieved 547 publications using the Web of Science Core Collection and conducted bibliometric analysis with CiteSpace and other bibliometric tools to examine publication volume, collaboration networks, citations, keywords, and other important bibliometric indicators. Results: The United States, the United Kingdom and China lead publication output, with institutions like the University of London, the National University of Singapore and Harvard University at the forefront. JMIR Medical Education is a pivotal journal. Research on ChatGPT and LLMs dominates, with growing focus on nursing education, digital health, medical exams, and medical ethics. Clinical reasoning, undergraduate education, and virtual reality have been identified as underexplored areas of research. Conclusion: AI and LLMs in medical education constitute a fast-evolving field, with journal calls shaping its bibliometric landscape and advancing the discipline. The field remains in a developmental phase, with subfields yet to be clearly defined. Topics such as nursing education, digital health, medical examinations, and conversational agents are gaining traction. Research on ChatGPT and LLMs holds a central and influential role. Emerging areas of focus include medical ethics, training methodologies, and skills development. Clinical reasoning, undergraduate education, and virtual reality in AI and LLMs for medical education are understudied, offering research opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.