ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2025
Interpreting insect behavior through the lens of executive functions.
Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite miniature brains, insects exhibit flexible, adaptive, and goal-directed responses. Behaviors indicating rule abstraction and complex decision-making challenge the long-standing view of insects as rigid organisms limited to fixed reflexes. Here, we propose a new perspective: interpreting insect behavior through the lens of executive functions (EF). EF refers to a set of cognitive processes enabling behavioral control in situations requiring goal-directed action or adaptation to demanding conditions. Central among EF are inhibition (suppressing automatic, task-irrelevant responses), shifting (switching between strategies or rules), and updating (maintaining and revising relevant information), yet working memory, attention, planning, decision-making, and metacognition are also related to a widely understood set of EF. We argue that insect cognition can be productively reconsidered using the EF framework. Many behaviors documented in the literature align with EF components, even if not explicitly labeled as such. Others can be reinterpreted as EF-driven. Importantly, we show that EF-based interpretations support testable predictions: if executive control is involved, behavior should follow developmental trajectories, exhibit trade-offs between speed and accuracy, and adapt to changing contexts-patterns not expected from fixed heuristics or reflexes. Nonetheless, applying EF concepts to insects comes with challenges. Standard EF paradigms were originally developed to test human participants and often rely on language and explicit task instructions. Moreover, superficially flexible behaviors may still result from specialized, domain-specific routines rather than general cognitive control. Nevertheless, when used carefully, the EF perspective provides a structured, functional framework for studying insect cognition, enabling precise comparison across species with well-established concepts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.