Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40832592›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2025

Interpreting insect behavior through the lens of executive functions.

Bartosz Baran, Michał Obidziński, Mateusz Hohol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bartosz BaranMathematical Cognition and Learning Lab, Copernicus Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
Michał ObidzińskiMathematical Cognition and Learning Lab, Copernicus Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
Mateusz HoholMathematical Cognition and Learning Lab, Copernicus Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite miniature brains, insects exhibit flexible, adaptive, and goal-directed responses. Behaviors indicating rule abstraction and complex decision-making challenge the long-standing view of insects as rigid organisms limited to fixed reflexes. Here, we propose a new perspective: interpreting insect behavior through the lens of executive functions (EF). EF refers to a set of cognitive processes enabling behavioral control in situations requiring goal-directed action or adaptation to demanding conditions. Central among EF are inhibition (suppressing automatic, task-irrelevant responses), shifting (switching between strategies or rules), and updating (maintaining and revising relevant information), yet working memory, attention, planning, decision-making, and metacognition are also related to a widely understood set of EF. We argue that insect cognition can be productively reconsidered using the EF framework. Many behaviors documented in the literature align with EF components, even if not explicitly labeled as such. Others can be reinterpreted as EF-driven. Importantly, we show that EF-based interpretations support testable predictions: if executive control is involved, behavior should follow developmental trajectories, exhibit trade-offs between speed and accuracy, and adapt to changing contexts-patterns not expected from fixed heuristics or reflexes. Nonetheless, applying EF concepts to insects comes with challenges. Standard EF paradigms were originally developed to test human participants and often rely on language and explicit task instructions. Moreover, superficially flexible behaviors may still result from specialized, domain-specific routines rather than general cognitive control. Nevertheless, when used carefully, the EF perspective provides a structured, functional framework for studying insect cognition, enabling precise comparison across species with well-established concepts.

Indexed as

behavioral controlbehavioral flexibilitycentral complexcomparative neuroethologyexecutive functionsinsect cognitionmushroom bodies

Identifiers

PMID40832592
PMCPMC12358439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.