Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40832586›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic research and reviews2025

Minimally Invasive Posterior SI Joint Fusion with a Novel Cortical Allograft: Real-World, Long-Term, Outcomes from a Large, Multisite US Cohort.

Chris Bovinet, Ajay Antony, Nomen Azeem, Pankaj Mehta, Richard S Epter, Vivek Velagapudi, Vinicius Tieppo Francio, Christopher M Lam, Dawood Sayed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic research and reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chris Bovinet *The Spine Center of SE Georgia, Brunswick, GA, USA.
Ajay Antony *The Orthopedic Institute, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Nomen Azeem *Florida Spine and Pain Specialists, Riverview, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6609-5976
Pankaj Mehta *The Pain Relief SurgiCenter, Pain Specialists of America, Austin, TX, USA.
Richard S Epter *Augusta Pain Center, Augusta, GA, USA.
Vivek Velagapudi *Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6460-0230
Vinicius Tieppo Francio *Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6513-0058
Christopher M Lam *Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2848-6255
Dawood Sayed *Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8867-2140

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction accounts for 15% to 30% of reported low back pain. Primary treatments of SI joint dysfunction include medications, bracing, physical therapy, injections, and ablations. When primary non-surgical treatments are unsuccessful, fusion or stabilization may be considered. Here, we report a multicenter study aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes of posterior sacroiliac joint fusion using cortical allograft across six United States clinical sites. Methods: Patients diagnosed with sacroiliitis through physical examination and diagnostic injection who have failed conservative management that ultimately underwent percutaneous allograft implant with at least 6 months of follow up were included. Data extracted from electronic health records included demographic and clinical characteristics, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, and patient-reported adverse events. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize baseline characteristics, and proportion of patients achieving minimally clinically important difference (MCID) was assessed. Paired t-tests were employed to compare pre-operative and post-operative outcomes. Results: A total of 258 patients were included. Of these, 63.9% were women and 36.1% were men, with a mean age of 69.2 years and an average body mass index of 29.6 kg/m². Average NRS at baseline was 7.61 ± 1.64 and 1.60 ± 1.86 (p < 0.05) at last follow-up visit. The mean pain reduction from baseline to the last follow-up (91.2 week mean or 1.75 years) was 6.01 points, exceeding MCID. The safety profile was favorable, with no serious adverse events reported in this cohort. Conclusion: Our findings affirm that posterior SI joint fusion constitutes an effective and enduring treatment option for patients suffering from SI joint dysfunction unresponsive to conservative care. The results indicate that posterior SI joint fusion is safe and effective at achieving sustained pain relief. Our findings are congruent with previously published studies and provide further evidence of sustained durable pain outcomes.

Indexed as

back painsacroiliac fusionsacroiliac jointsacroiliac joint dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID40832586
PMCPMC12360366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.