Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40832580›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Exercise type, training load, velocity loss threshold, and sets affect the relationship between lifting velocity and perceived repetitions in reserve in strength-trained individuals.

Gøran Paulsen, Roger Myrholt, Fredrik Mentzoni, Paul Andre Solberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gøran PaulsenDepartment of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Roger MyrholtDepartment of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Fredrik MentzoniNorwegian Olympic and Paralympic Committee and Confederation of Sports, Oslo, Norway.
Paul Andre SolbergNorwegian Olympic and Paralympic Committee and Confederation of Sports, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the relationship between bar velocity and perceived repetitions in reserve (pRIR) for the bench press and the squat exercises during multiple training sessions in strength-trained individuals. Methods: Nineteen well-trained individuals (9♀ and 10♂, 26 ± 4 yr, 174 ± 8 cm, 74 ± 9 kg (mean ± standard deviation)) trained squats and bench press for six weeks. Within each week, they conducted three sessions with different loads, corresponding to ∼77-79%, ∼82-84%, and ∼87-89% of one repetition maximum (1RM). The mean velocity was measured at the bar for all lifts, and the participants terminated each set based on a pre-set velocity loss threshold (20-60%). After every set termination, the participants reported pRIR. Results: Based on 2,972 unique measurements, we observed trivial to very large individual correlations between the objectively measured mean velocity and the pRIR (average r Discussion and conclusion: Our findings indicate that mean bar velocity and pRIR offer complementary-but not interchangeable-perspectives on strength training performance. Because pRIR was systematically influenced by exercise type, external load, proximity to failure, and set number, practitioners and researchers should interpret pRIR with caution and in the context of these variables.

Indexed as

Muscle StrengthResistance TrainingWeight LiftingAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBench pressExercise monitoringRate of perceived exertionSquatStrength training

Identifiers

PMID40832580
PMCPMC12360324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.