ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2025
Echocardiographic measurement of inferior vena cava diameter for estimating central venous pressure in adult Fontan patients.
Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inferior Vena Cava Ultrasound Does Not Reliably Estimate Systemic Venous Pressure in Adults With a Fontan Circulation.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: In adult Fontan patients, a higher central venous pressure (CVP) is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Assessing CVP is helpful to guide therapeutic strategies; however, it remains unclear whether CVP can be accurately estimated from the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter by echocardiography. Methods and results: This single-centre, retrospective study enrolled 21 adult Fontan patients (median age: 21.5 years, 52% male) who had a transthoracic echocardiogram performed after admission for a scheduled cardiac catheterization. The relationship between CVP estimated by echocardiography and CVP measured by catheterization was investigated. According to echocardiographic guidelines, CVP was estimated to be 3, 8, or 15 mmHg on the basis of the IVC diameter and its respiratory collapse. To evaluate the agreement between estimated and measured CVP grades, measured CVP was also classified into three grades. The mean IVC diameter and measured CVP were 1.41 ± 0.27 cm and 11.9 ± 2.8 mmHg, respectively. Both the IVC diameter and the estimated CVP grade were correlated with measured CVP ( Conclusion: In adult Fontan patients, the echocardiographic classification of CVP grading using the IVC diameter may underestimate CVP, suggesting that this echocardiographic method cannot replace invasive methods in accurately assessing CVP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.