ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Early Musculoskeletal Pain Management in the General Practitioner's Office & E-Referral: A Multidisciplinary Expert Opinion.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Empirical evaluation of an ICF core set for managing musculoskeletal conditions in primary care physical therapy services in Spain: a multicenter study.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Musculoskeletal pain (MP) is a significant burden in primary care, often presenting challenges for general practitioners (GPs) in providing timely and effective management. Despite MP's prevalence, GPs face limitations in diagnostic resources and access to specialists, which can delay intervention and increase the risk of pain chronicity. This multidisciplinary expert opinion aims to establish a structured approach for the management of MP within general practice, using three targeted algorithms: (1) early management of acute MP in the GP's office, (2) post-surgical MP management to support recovery, and (3) MP management following emergency discharge. Patients and Methods: A panel of GPs, physiatrists, and orthopedists collaborated to develop practical recommendations based on current clinical guidelines, emphasizing early diagnosis, initial pain control, and effective e-referral pathways. During an onsite meeting, they created an algorithm to identify waiting therapy for patients with pain, in order to help GPs in this difficult task. Results: The first algorithm focuses on early intervention for acute MP in primary care, with recommendations for both pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. The second algorithm addresses post-surgical MP management to enhance recovery and reduce complications. The third algorithm outlines post-emergency management strategies, emphasizing immediate pain relief and integrating patient education to support home management. E-referral and teleconsultation are incorporated throughout to enhance care coordination. Conclusion: These three algorithms provide a structured framework for MP management in primary care, placing GPs at the centre of early intervention. The inclusion of telemedicine and e-referral pathways allows for timely specialist input, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes and minimize chronic pain risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.