ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Physical and psychological differences between athletes with and without chronic primary low back pain: a scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Static and Dynamic Motor Control in Active Young Adults: Associations with Oswestry Disability Index and Functional Movement Screen Asymmetries.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Low back pain among athletes varies by sport, age, and sex, affecting performance and contributing to sports retirement. Recently, there has been an increasing focus on chronic primary low back pain (CPLBP) in athletes. The aim of this scoping review is to examine the existing literature on CPLBP, focusing on the physical and psychological differences between athletes with and without CPLBP. Design and Methods: A systematic search across MEDLINE, CINAHL, SportDiscus, and PsycINFO, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Guidelines (PRISMA), identified 11 relevant studies. Three key concepts guided the search: "chronic low back pain", "physical and psychological characteristics", and "athletes". Results: From 1,767 screened articles, 11 studies involving 717 athletes (301 with CPLBP and 416 without) met the inclusion criteria. Most studies showed that athletes with CPLBP had significantly lower trunk muscle activation amplitudes and delayed onset. One study found that athletes with CPLBP had significantly reduced trunk extension strength. Kinematic evaluations showed a significant increase in trunk damping and lumbar extension in athletes with CPLBP compared to athletes without CPLBP. However, other studies reported no significant differences in trunk muscle activity, kinetic and kinematic variables. Finally, athletes with CPLBP reported significantly higher kinesiophobia, anxiety and pain catastrophizing scores. Conclusions: This review shows significant physiological and psychological differences between athletes with and without CPLBP. Future research should focus on sport-specific assessments of CPLBP and its impact on performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.