ArticleIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
Effectiveness of Round by Peers on Critical Thinking and Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Students.
Article in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Strengthening critical thinking and clinical decision-making skills is important for nursing. Therefore, it is essential to use appropriate educational methods to influence these factors. This study aimed to assess the impact of peers' round on nursing students' clinical decision-making and critical thinking abilities. Materials and Methods: In this semi-experimental study, 67 final-year nursing students participated in round meetings at Ganjavian Hospital in Dezful, Iran, from January 2022 to July 2023. They were selected using a census sampling method. After selecting patients from different hospital departments and presenting them in groups of 3-4 individuals, group members collected patient information and used experts' opinions to present rounds with other students. Before and after the initiation of the program, participants completed critical thinking (18 questions) and clinical decision-making (40 questions) questionnaires. Data were analyzed using the independent Results: Rounds by peers improved students' critical thinking (t Conclusions: Considering the effect of round by peers on critical thinking and clinical decision-making in nursing students, nursing schools should employ new methods for the clinical training of their students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.