ArticleGastroenterology report2025
Stool-based methylated syndecan-2 testing has a high positive predictive value in an average/increased-risk population: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Gastroenterology report, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Stool DNA testing based on methylated syndecan-2 (mSDC2) is a potential novel non-invasive screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to assess its positive predictive value (PPV) in real-world practice. Methods: This study retrospectively recruited consecutive patients with positive stool DNA-based SDC2 methylation tests from 18 hospitals between November 2016 and July 2021. Included patients were classified into the average-risk equivalent or increased-risk population and the previous-negative-colonoscopy or no-previous-colonoscopy groups. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to investigate the risk factors that affect the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) in patients with a positive mSDC2 test. The primary outcome was the PPV for ACN. Results: The overall PPVs for ACN, CRC, and colorectal neoplasia were 28.5%, 12.8%, and 44.6%, respectively. The PPV for ACN was higher in the no-previous-colonoscopy group than in the previous-negative-colonoscopy group (30.1% vs 18.5%, Conclusions: The mSDC2 test, which has a high PPV for both ACN and CRC, is expected to be an alternative CRC screening strategy. Patients with a positive mSDC2 test might require a colonoscopy as soon as possible, even if the previous colonoscopy was negative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.