Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40832437›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025

Ethnoracial and rural-urban differences in female sterilization in Bolivia, Colombia, Guatemala, and Peru.

Lucrecia Mena-Meléndez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lucrecia Mena-MeléndezDepartment of Applied Health Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In Latin America, 26 percent of women use sterilization to avert unwanted pregnancies. Although sterilization provides first-tier effectiveness, long-acting continuation over time, and life-long cost-benefit, previous research has documented persistent inequalities in access and use worldwide. Methods: This study uses Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data for Bolivia, Colombia, Guatemala, and Peru (1986-2015), to explore ethnoracial, geographic, socioeconomic, individual, and reproductive differences in female sterilization [N (level-1 women) = 112,135; N (level-2 clusters) = 4,946]. Results: Results from descriptive analyses and logistic multilevel regression models indicate that ethnoracial minorities and rural women had lower odds of reporting female sterilization as their current contraceptive method. Compared to Bolivian women, Colombian and Guatemalan women had higher odds of reporting sterilization, while Peruvian women had lower odds. Older, wealthier, more educated, and those employed outside the home had higher odds of reporting sterilization. Additionally, those older at first birth, with higher parity, with a longer interval since preceding birth, and with previous experience with unintended pregnancies had higher odds of reporting sterilization. Discussion: Findings suggest that social, geographic, and structural factors may shape equitable access to sterilization for some groups. Future efforts should prioritize reducing access gaps between ethnoracial groups and rural-urban populations by strengthening health systems and ensuring culturally appropriate, equitable care.

Indexed as

afro-descendentethnoracial minoritiesfemale sterilizationindigenousLatin Americarural-urban inequality

Identifiers

PMID40832437
PMCPMC12358441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.