ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Sleep chart of biological aging clocks across organs and omics.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimal sleep plays a vital role in promoting healthy aging and enhancing longevity. This study proposes a Sleep Chart to assess the relationship between sleep duration and 23 biological aging clocks across 17 organ systems or tissues and 3 omics data types (imaging, proteomics, and metabolomics). First, a systemic, U-shaped pattern shows that both short (<6 hours) and long (>8 hours) sleep duration are linked to elevated biological age gaps (BAGs) across 9 brain and body systems and 3 omics types, with optimal sleep time varying by organ and sex ([6.4-7.8] hours). Furthermore, short and long sleep duration, compared to a normal sleep duration ([6-8] hours), are consistently linked to increased risk of systemic diseases beyond the brain and all-cause mortality, with evidence from genetic correlations and time to incident disease predictions, such as migraine, depression, and diabetes. Finally, short and long sleep duration are associated with late-life depression via distinct pathways: long sleep may contribute indirectly through biological aging processes, while short sleep shows a more direct link. Although our Mendelian randomization does not show strong causal effects from disease to sleep disturbances, it does not fully rule out the possibility that sleep disturbances may, in part, reflect underlying disease burden. Our findings suggest that the U-shaped relationship is likely driven by modifiable sleep disturbances rather than genetic predisposition, highlighting the potential of sleep optimization to support healthy aging, lower disease risk, and extend longevity. An interactive web portal is available to explore the Sleep Chart at: https://labs-laboratory.com/sleepchart.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.