ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Phenome-Wide Risk Evaluation of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use in Type 2 Diabetes with Real-World Data Across Multiple Healthcare Systems.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), widely used for managing type 2 diabetes (T2D) and weight, are gaining attention for treatment of a broad set of conditions. Large-scale, real-world evidence of their broader clinical impact is needed. We assessed the phenome-wide risks and benefits of new users of GLP-1RA versus sulfonylureas, SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i), and DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) in adults with T2D in a multi-healthcare center, 1:1 high-dimensional propensity score matched new user cohort study utilizing principles of target trial emulation with electronic health records (EHRs) of over 9 million patients followed up to 730 days. Primary outcomes included 239 clinical endpoints across 14 organ systems. Among 86,790 patients, mean age was 58-66 years and 44-62% were female across cohorts. Compared to DPP-4i, GLP-1RA use was associated with a reduced risk of acute myocardial infarction (sHR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.85) and chronic kidney disease (sHR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62-0.81). Compared to sulfonylurea, GLP-1RA use was associated with reduced acute renal failure risk (sHR 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.90). GLP-1RA use was associated with reduced heart failure risk compared to SGLT-2i (sHR 0.66, 95% CI 0.55-0.80). GLP-1RA also was associated with lower epilepsy risk versus DPP-4i (sHR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.76). GLP1RA was associated with elevated risks of nausea/vomiting: sHR 1.37 vs SGLT2i, 95% CI 1.15-1.62; sHR 1.46 vs sulfonylureas, 95% CI 1.24-1.71). Head-to-head real-world comparisons with established T2D therapies confirmed the broad cardiorenal and metabolic benefits and known on-target adverse effects of GLP-1RAs -consistent with randomized clinical trials - but also suggest potential risks for musculoskeletal and genitourinary adverse events, warranting continued real-world post-market surveillance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.