ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
BADLOCK: A Rapid, Portable, Inexpensive Diagnostic for Bacterial Pathogen and Resistance Detection in Resource-Limited Settings.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning for CRISPR-Based Diagnostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance is a major global health threat, with disproportionate impact in regions with limited diagnostic infrastructure. To address this challenge, we developed BADLOCK (Bacterial and AMR Detection by SHERLOCK), a rapid, low-cost molecular diagnostic platform for direct detection of bacterial pathogens and resistance genes from clinical samples. BADLOCK operates as a one-pot CRISPR-Cas13a reaction capable of detecting nine bacterial species and four major resistance genes directly from positive blood culture. It requires only a heat block and supports both fluorescence and paper-based lateral flow readouts. We validated BADLOCK on a prospectively collected clinical cohort of 194 blood culture specimens, supplemented with 69 mock samples generated from banked isolates enriched for targeted resistance genes. Across all cohorts, we conducted 2,224 individual reactions, achieving 97.6% accuracy (2,171/2,224) at the reaction level. At the assay level, 89.5% (274/306) showed perfect or partial concordance with gold-standard species and resistance gene detection, including 255 assays with perfect concordance and 19 with partial concordance (correct detection of at least one pathogen). This included an evaluation of BADLOCK as a potential culture-free diagnostic for urinary tract infections (UTIs), achieving 98.0% reaction-level accuracy. At the assay level, 90.7% (41/43) were perfectly concordant with gold-standard detection of both species and resistance genes, with 2 additional assays showing partial concordance. To our knowledge, this represents the first demonstration of the CRISPR-Cas13a diagnostic platform on clinical bloodstream infections to date and supports BADLOCK's potential as a practical and scalable solution for rapid pathogen and resistance gene detection in resource-constrained settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.