ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Large Language Models for Psychiatric Phenotype Extraction from Electronic Health Records.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accurate detection of clinical phenotypes from electronic health records (EHRs) is pivotal for advancing large-scale genetic and longitudinal studies in psychiatry. Free-text clinical notes are an essential source of symptom-level information, particularly in psychiatry. However, the automated extraction of symptoms from clinical text remains challenging. Here, we tested 11 open-source generative large language models (LLMs) for their ability to detect 109 psychiatric phenotypes from clinical text, using annotated EHR notes from a psychiatric clinic in Colombia. The LLMs were evaluated both "out-of-the-box" and after fine-tuning, and compared against a traditional natural language processing (tNLP) method developed from the same data. We show that while base LLM performance was poor to moderate (0.2-0.6 macro-F1 for zero-shot; 0.2-0.74 macro-F1 for few shot), it improved significantly after fine-tuning (0.75-0.86 macro-F1), with several fine-tuned LLMs outperforming the tNLP method. In total, 100 phenotypes could be reliably detected (F1>0.8) using either a fine-tuned LLM or tNLP. To generate a fine-tuned LLM that can be shared with the scientific and medical community, we created a fully synthetic dataset free of patient information but based on original annotations. We fine-tuned a top-performing LLM on this data, creating "Mistral-small-psych", an LLM that can detect psychiatric phenotypes from Spanish text with performance comparable to that of LLMs trained on real EHR data (macro-F1=0.79). Finally, the fine-tuned LLMs underwent an external validation using data from a large psychiatric hospital in Colombia, the Hospital Mental de Antioquia, highlighting that most LLMs generalized well (0.02-0.16 point loss in macro-F1). Our study underscores the value of domain-specific adaptation of LLMs and introduces a new model for accurate psychiatric phenotyping in Spanish text, paving the way for global precision psychiatry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.