ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2025
Intravenous iron reactions: Insights from an allergy and immunology perspective.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hypophosphatemia in Patients Receiving Intravenous Iron Supplementation for Iron-Deficiency Anemia: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diagnosis and management of intravenous iron reactions is often challenging, as skin testing has unproven utility and most reactions are non-IgE-mediated. Objective: We aimed to identify clinical patterns and tolerability predictors in patients with reactions to intravenous iron. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with reactions to intravenous iron who were referred to the Vanderbilt University Medical Center Drug Allergy Clinic from April 2014 through January 2025 and administered a follow-up survey via RedCap to evaluate patient outcomes with future intravenous iron administration. Results: Of the 51 patients presenting for adverse reactions to intravenous iron, 48 had skin testing performed. The skin testing results were deemed negative in all 48 cases (100%). Notable laboratory test results within 1 year of reaction were low vitamin D level (47%), high parathyroid hormone level (46%), and low phosphorus level (10%). Many patients (56%) were dermatographic, and their drug alert labels included opioids (31%), fluoroquinolones (14%), and radiocontrast dye (8%). Following assessment, 31 patients received intravenous iron (61%) using formulations that were the same as (n = 15 [48%]) and/or different from (n = 17 [55%]) the forumlation initially implicated, with the various modifications including antihistamines, slower infusion rate, and intravenous fluid pretreatment. Of these 31 patients, 27 (87%) tolerated the infusions. Additionally, following evaluation, the patients were surveyed regarding subsequent intravenous iron administrations, eliciting a 29% response rate (n = 15). Of the responders, 7 patients (47%) reported receiving intravenous iron after evaluation; all 7 reported tolerance. Conclusion: Most reactions to intravenous iron are non-IgE-mediated; however, our study introduces 2 novel observations, namely, a high frequency of dermatographism (56%) and common colabeling of these patients with drug alerts to Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X2 (MRGPRX2)-activating drugs, suggesting a possible shared pathophysiologic mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.