Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40832359›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Adaptive behavior is guided by integrated representations of controlled and non-controlled information.

Bingfang Huang, Harrison Ritz, Jiefeng Jiang

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bingfang HuangDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-7241-0212
Harrison RitzPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3011-2946
Jiefeng JiangDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

Funding

Neurocognitive mechanisms of task representation reorganization during task learningR01MH131559 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Jiefeng Jiang · 2022 to 2026
$2.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH131559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how task knowledge is encoded neurally is crucial for uncovering the mechanisms underlying adaptive behavior. Here, we test the theory that all task information is integrated into a conjunctive task representation by investigating whether this representation simultaneously includes two types of associations that can guide behavior: stimulus-response (non-controlled) associations and stimulus-control (controlled) associations that inform how task focus should be adjusted to achieve goal-directed behavior. We extended the classic item-specific proportion congruency paradigm to dissociate the electroencephalographic (EEG) representations of controlled and non-controlled associations. Behavioral data replicated previous findings of association-driven adaptive behaviors. Decoding analyses of EEG data further showed that associations of controlled and non-controlled information were represented concurrently and differentially. Brain-behavioral analyses also showed that the strength of both associations was associated with faster responses. These findings support the idea that controlled and non-controlled associations are governed by an integrated task representation to guide adaptive behaviors simultaneously.

Indexed as

adaptive behaviorcognitive controldecodingintegrated task representationitem-specific proportion congruencyrepresentational similarity analysis

Identifiers

PMID40832359
PMCPMC12363798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.