Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40832273›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Optimizing electrode placement and information capacity for local field potentials in cortex.

Jace A Willis, Christopher E Wright, Ruoqian Zhu, Yilan Ruan, Joshua Stallings, Amada M Abrego, Takfa Medani, Promit Moitra, John C Mosher, Arjun Ramakrishnan and 5 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Christopher E Wright
Ruoqian Zhu
Yilan Ruan
Takfa Medani
Promit Moitra
Arjun RamakrishnanORCID 0000-0002-4622-4873
Charles E Schroeder

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent neurosurgery advancements include improved stereotactic targeting and increased electrode contacts. This study introduces a subject-specific, in silico modeling tool for optimizing electrode placement and maximizing coverage with a variety of devices. The basis for optimization is the inherent information patterns of field potentials derived from dipolar sources. The approach integrates subject-specific MRI data with finite element modeling (FEM) used to simulate the sensitivity of subdural and intracortical devices. Sensitivity maps, or lead fields, from these models enable the comparison of different electrode placements, contact sizes, contact configurations, and substrate properties, which are often overlooked factors. One tool is a genetic algorithm that optimizes electrode placement by maximizing information capacity. Another is a sparse sensor method, Sparse Electrode Placement for Input Optimization (SEPIO), that selects the best sensor subsets for accurate source classification. We demonstrate several use cases for clinicians, engineers, and researchers. Overall, these open-source tools offer a quantitative framework to juxtapose devices in one's neurosurgical armament or optimize device and contact placement. It may help users refine electrode coverage with low channel count devices and minimize invasive surgery burden. The study demonstrates that optimized electrode placement significantly improves the information capacity and signal quality of LFP recordings. The tools developed offer a valuable approach for refining neurosurgical techniques and enhancing the design of neural implants.

Identifiers

PMID40832273
PMCPMC12363811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.