ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Optimizing electrode placement and information capacity for local field potentials in cortex.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent neurosurgery advancements include improved stereotactic targeting and increased electrode contacts. This study introduces a subject-specific, in silico modeling tool for optimizing electrode placement and maximizing coverage with a variety of devices. The basis for optimization is the inherent information patterns of field potentials derived from dipolar sources. The approach integrates subject-specific MRI data with finite element modeling (FEM) used to simulate the sensitivity of subdural and intracortical devices. Sensitivity maps, or lead fields, from these models enable the comparison of different electrode placements, contact sizes, contact configurations, and substrate properties, which are often overlooked factors. One tool is a genetic algorithm that optimizes electrode placement by maximizing information capacity. Another is a sparse sensor method, Sparse Electrode Placement for Input Optimization (SEPIO), that selects the best sensor subsets for accurate source classification. We demonstrate several use cases for clinicians, engineers, and researchers. Overall, these open-source tools offer a quantitative framework to juxtapose devices in one's neurosurgical armament or optimize device and contact placement. It may help users refine electrode coverage with low channel count devices and minimize invasive surgery burden. The study demonstrates that optimized electrode placement significantly improves the information capacity and signal quality of LFP recordings. The tools developed offer a valuable approach for refining neurosurgical techniques and enhancing the design of neural implants.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.