Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40832232›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Compact Vision-Language Models Enable Efficient and Interpretable Automated OCT Analysis Through Layer Specific Multimodal Learning.

Tania Haghighi, Sina Gholami, Jared Todd Sokol, Jennifer I Lim, Theodore Leng, Atalie C Thompson, Hamed Tabkhi, Minhaj Nur Alam

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tania HaghighiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-0309-3407
Sina GholamiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
Jared Todd SokolByers Eye Institute at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Jennifer I LimUniversity of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Theodore LengByers Eye Institute at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Atalie C ThompsonSurgical Ophthalmology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Hamed TabkhiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
Minhaj Nur AlamDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.

Funding

Distributed approaches to train machine learning models in diabetic retinopathyR15EY035804 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI ALAM, MINHAJ NUR · 2024 to 2024
$460k
Domain-adaptive federated learning to develop machine learning models for predicting incident and progression of geographic atrophyR21EY035271 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE · PI ALAM, MINHAJ NUR · 2024 to 2024
$379k
NEI NIH HHS R15 EY035804NEI NIH HHS R21 EY035271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translating the intricate anatomical signatures of retinal disease from OCT B-scans into clear, accurate clinical narratives demands AI models that seamlessly fuse visual features with domain expertise. We curated a multimodal dataset of 40,000 OCT B-scans from public repositories and private clinical cohorts, each paired with expert validated summaries spanning six conditions: diabetic macular edema, diabetic retinopathy, geographic atrophy, drusen, choroidal neovascularization, and healthy retina. We introduce LO-VLM, a compact (247M parameter) vision-language model (VLM) that infuses anatomical guidance into both encoder and decoder for free form summary generation and multiclass disease classification. Benchmarking against state-of-the-art RetinaVLM, LLaVA-Med, and a ViT vision only model demonstrates superior performance. In a blinded evaluation by three board certified retina specialists scored the generated summaries, LO-VLM narratives achieved mean = 8.5 (standard deviation = 1.15) out of 10, compared to mean = 5.5 (standard deviation = 1.13) for RetinaVLM (p < 0.0001). In quantitative evaluations, LO-VLM achieved an SBERT similarity of 0.803 and a BERTScore F1 of 0.715, representing improvements of 8.2% and 28.8% over specialized VLM baselines. For disease classification, LO-VLM reached 96% accuracy (F1 = 96%), outperforming ViT by 13% and exceeding medical VLM benchmarks by over 62%. By reconciling interpretability with computational efficiency, LO-VLM establishes a new paradigm for efficient AI models in OCT interpretation.

Identifiers

PMID40832232
PMCPMC12363835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.