ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
High-Resolution Detection of Hidden Antibiotic Resistance with the Dilution-and-Delay (DnD) Susceptibility Assay.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rising rates of antibiotic treatment failure highlight the complexity of resistance mechanisms. While conventional, genetically encoded resistance is well established, recent studies have uncovered widespread non-canonical mechanisms driven by phenotypically insensitive subpopulations hiding in seemingly susceptible populations, such as heteroresistance, persistence or adaptive resistance. These variants are not only clinically significant but also act as evolutionary precursors to fully resistant populations, rendering infections increasingly difficult to control. Yet standard antibiotic susceptibility tests lack the resolution and dynamic range needed to detect this wide spectrum of resistance mechanisms and their evolutionary progression, often misguiding clinical decisions, obscuring mechanisms of failure, and underestimating the true epidemiology of antibiotic resistance. To address these limitations, we introduce the Dilution-and-Delay (DnD) assay-a practical, high-resolution approach that implements two basic principles of bacterial growth in the antibiotic susceptibility testing format. Using well-defined synthetic communities and strains, we demonstrate that the DnD assay quantifies viable cells over more than eight orders of magnitude and detects rare antibiotic-insensitive cells at frequencies as low as 1 in 100 million. It additionally reports the standardized MIC as a secondary output, thereby capturing the average antibiotic response of the majority population and heterogeneity of minority subpopulations within a single assay. We scaled this approach for high-throughput application, classifying ∼120 previously uncharacterized clinical isolates of Significance: Antibiotic treatment failure due to inappropriate prescription remains a critical threat to global health. It also accelerates the evolution of resistance, making infection increasingly difficult to control. A key underlying issue is that current antibiotic susceptibility testing lacks the resolution and dynamic range needed to detect a wide range of resistance mechanisms and their evolutionary progression, leading to misinformed clinical decisions. While population analysis profiling (PAP) offers sufficient accuracy, it is too labor-intensive for routine use. Single-cell approaches are technically demanding and resource-intensive. Here, we present a susceptibility testing strategy that preserves the operational efficiency and compatibility of conventional workflows, while dramatically extending their resolution and dynamic range. Our approach is scalable, quantitative, and well-suited for high-throughput applications in both research and clinical settings-closing a critical diagnostic gap in the fight against antibiotic treatment failure.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.